What Is An Alternative Approach To Fee For Service Model Of Healthcare L

Takeaways

Fee-for-service health care is hurting patients and driving up costs. The lack of accountability in the fee-for-service organization allows doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and pharmaceutical companies to point the finger at one some other when things go wrong. The result? Patients are at risk and prices skyrocket. Due to fee-for-service, some patients get too much care, some do not get plenty, and others get the incorrect care. They all become inflated bills. The United states deserves a better health care system—one that is accountable for quality and costs.

Afterward going to an emergency room in Colorado for a severe pain in her belly, Claire Lang-Ree, a college pupil, received a bill for nearly $19,000 that included charges for an "4 button."ⁱ The charges included $700 each fourth dimension a nurse pumped a drug into Claire intravenously. The drugs helped control the discomfort from what turned out to be a ruptured ovarian cyst, which is non life-threatening only painful. But the extra charges for the 4 push are relatively new. In Claire's instance, the insurance company blocked the actress charges, merely hospitals are increasingly getting paid for them and the rates are going up.²

An Four button is only ane of more than 10,000 medical services for which providers tin can bill.³ Since that billing system began in 1966, the number of codes for billable services has tripled. The sheer size and complexity of this system, which is known as fee-for-service medicine, perpetuates itself as providers await for new ways to increase their revenue. Information technology is not, still, tied to improving intendance for patients because information technology is based on what providers do, not how patients fare. The lack of accountability of fee-for-service medicine is hurting patients and driving up costs.

In this report, we look at what the fee-for-service system is and the furnishings it has on patients and overall costs. Nosotros show that the structure of fee-for-service has created incentives that are completely backwards. It creates two sets of major bug: 1) some patients get too much care, some not enough, and others get the wrong intendance; and 2) it drives up prices considering no one is answerable for the outcomes from the care patients receive.

What is Fee-for-Service?

The traditional payment system for health care in the United States is fee-for-service. Specifically, fee-for-service pays doctors, hospitals, nursing homes, and other health care providers separately for each service or health care product they provide. It is how near doctors become paid now. In 2018, it deemed for 70% of their overall acquirement.⁴

Simply what does information technology hateful to bill for each service or product? Let's take Claire—the hospital billed her for multiple parts of her stay in the emergency room on superlative of a apartment basic rate: the lab tests, a scan, 4 drugs, the 4 pushes, and $6.50 for a pill.^v Her health program blocked near of the dissever charges, but hospitals proceed to bill separate charges when a patient goes out-of-network for health care or does not accept insurance.

Image Alt Text

While each product or service is billed individually in a fee-for-service organization, the maximum cost of each line on the bill is calculated past asking two things:

Why does the person need treatment? Whether a patient seeks care for migraines or diabetes, every symptom and its cause are given a code from a system chosen the ICD-10. There are over 70,000 different ICD-10 codes, from an acute post-traumatic headache (G44.311) to being struck by a falling object (W20.8xxA).⁶
What procedure is the medical professional person performing? Each procedure is then given a number, called CPT and HCPCS Level II codes, to identify what the medical professional is doing (CPT codes) and what they are using (HCPCS Level II codes). In that location are over 17,000 CPT and HCPCS codes, from a colonoscopy (45378) to a 10 mg injection of chemotherapy (J9355).^vii

A doctor's part or hospital enters those codes into a medical billing system, which generates the greatest possible amount of money to neb a health plan for the services. When a health plan like Medicare or a private insurer receive the bill, they check to make certain that the procedures line upwards with the patient's diagnosis code (ICD-10 code) and are not exaggerated or unnecessary. They besides make sure the patient has coverage for the services provided. And then the wellness plan assigns the standard amount they pay for those services. The adding of that amount differs depending on whether the patient uses Medicare or individual insurance.

For those using Medicare, a "fee schedule" generates the cost based on the codes for the medical billing system. This schedule, maintained past the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and set past Congress, lists the maximum payment a clinician receives for a specific service from Medicare.⁸ Medicare then adjusts payments down based on factors such equally geography or skill required for a process. For example, a service provided in Des Moines, IA will be discounted more than than the same service provided in San Francisco, CA because it costs less to exercise medicine in Iowa.⁹

Determining the actual cost for patients with private insurance is opaque. Individual health plans negotiate rates for services with hospitals and doctors. When codes are entered into the billing system, the cost of that service is the negotiated charge per unit betwixt the wellness program and provider for in-network care. With numerous health plans and medical providers in different markets, those negotiated rates vary widely. A regulation issued under the Trump Administration sought to make the negotiated prices transparent by requiring hospitals to publish online a list of 300 services that patients tin use to compare prices before they choose a hospital.¹⁰ But compliance with the regulation has been very depression.¹¹ Members of Congress and the Assistants are pushing to increase the penalties on hospitals not complying.¹²

The sheer number of codes and billing rules can be onerous and inefficient. To address this, Medicare created the Diagnosis Related Group system (DRGs) in the 1980s to make hospital billing more efficient. DRGs reduced the thousands of inpatient ICD-10 billing codes to well-nigh 750 commonly used combinations.¹³ For case, treating a patient with a hip fracture is DRG 210. Medicare calculates the price of this DRG from the average cost of care for a "typical" patient in that group and then adjusts for a variety of factors such every bit age and geography. For the patient with a hip fracture, the DRG price would increase if the patient was older, if the care took place in a city with a higher cost of living, or if that patient was diagnosed with a secondary condition like osteoporosis.¹⁴ While DRGs incentivize hospitals to exist more efficient in coordinating intendance and controlling costs, they practice non extend to most physicians' charges, and therefore don't encourage integration across the health organization.

With a set up price for the services that goes into intendance, the fee-for-service system leads to more than volume—exercise more services, get more coin regardless of patient outcomes.

Trouble #i: Substandard Intendance for Patients

The structure of fee-for-service has created incentives that are completely backwards. The lack of accountability in the fee-for-service system allows doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, and pharmaceutical companies to betoken the finger at one another when things go incorrect. The result? Fee-for-service hurts patients and drives up costs. Due to fee-for-service, some patients get too much care, some do not get enough, and others go the wrong care. Each of these three outcomes is explored further beneath.

Beginning, some patients get too much care. Physicians report that xx% of medical care is unnecessary, including 22% of prescribed medication, 25% of tests, and eleven% of procedures.¹⁵ This is also chosen over-treatment or over-testing. That should not exist a surprise nether the electric current incentives—when a medical resource is available and profitable, a hospital or medico is more probable to use that resource. For example, a Dartmouth Atlas Projection study found that in regions with more than hospital beds, patients are more probable to exist admitted to the infirmary. Similarly, in regions with more intensive care unit (ICU) beds, more patients will be cared for in the ICU. And more specialty doctors means patients have more specialty visits.¹⁶

Fundamentally, fee-for-service rewards book and high prices over quality. While the vast majority of medical doctors work every twenty-four hours to make patients better, the system'southward incentives are however completely flawed. If a doctor or nurse tries to go more efficient and curb overuse, the system punishes the hospital or part where they piece of work because reimbursements go down. Picture this: A patient comes dwelling from surgery, merely to have to render to the hospital to fix a fault. Under fee-for-service, clinicians and hospitals are paid more for worse outcomes considering more care is needed.¹⁷ To add together insult to injury, the patient still pays the pecker for that readmission or failed procedure.

That overuse hurts patients' health. For instance:

Overuse kills patients. Exposure to more medical treatment means more take chances of harm and death. The medical overuse of opioids has contributed to thousands of overdose deaths. In 2019, more than fourteen,000 people died from opioids prescribed by clinicians.^xviii This inefficient and sometimes deadly care costs anywhere from $270 billion to $780 billion annually.¹⁹
Overuse leads to injury. For example, 34% of knee joint replacements lonely are not needed, which leads to approximately 14,000 patients suffering from infections, blood clots, eye problems, or some other health problem every year considering of the procedure.^twenty
Overuse causes duplicative care. For instance, twenty% of adults with an affliction report that their doctor ordered a exam that had already been done in the past 2 years.²¹ Duplicative CT scans unnecessarily betrayal patients to radiations equal to about 350 X-rays.²² Unnecessary imaging costs as much as $eleven.95 billion a year.²³
Overuse has huge social consequences. For example, the overuse of antibiotics causes microbial resistance, which puts the patient and population at gamble for deadly infections.²⁴ Overuse of antibiotics for viral respiratory infections (which antibiotics cannot cure) solitary may cost $1.one billion.²⁵

Second, some patients practice not receive plenty care. Likewise called underuse, patients frequently do not become enough of the care they need. This takes many forms—from limited admission to health care, to an inadequate supply of providers, to unaffordable treatments, to the slow uptake of innovations.²⁶ It is a huge trouble: underuse is four times more mutual than overuse.²⁷ Information technology also drives much of the racial and ethnic disparities in health care.²⁸

Fee-for-service assigns a financial value to every service, which means some services volition be worth more than others. Over the by decade, new technologies and loftier-cost services accept been added to the fee schedule, which drives up payments to specialty doctors without increasing the payments for existing services, similar primary care. This has led to specialty doctors making 2.v times more than principal intendance doctors.²⁹ That is ane key reason for a shortage of primary care doctors and limited access for patients. In the United States, in that location will be a shortage of betwixt 15,000 and 49,000 primary care doctors in a decade.³⁰ As the number of primary care doctors pass up, the number of primary care visits has too been steadily declining equally payment rates have fallen.³¹ Imagine if a patient with diabetes tin can't encounter their main care doctor to monitor their claret sugar levels—that patient risks facing severe complications like blindness, amputation, and even death.

Further, fee-for-service drives upwards costs which causes patients with limited financial resources to cut back necessary medical care and medications. One-in-four diabetic patients report using less insulin than prescribed due to the high costs. Underusing insulin increases a patient's gamble of severe complications and early expiry.³² Those weather are all far more expensive than taking insulin. Yet, the price many patients pay out-of-pocket for insulin has risen significantly, which is partly due to a complicated pricing system for drugs.³³ Underusing necessary care hurts patients and causes downstream care to be more common and expensive.

When doctors are not accountable for or paid for the health of their patients, they do niggling to get them preventive care. In other words, treating sick patients is more than assisting than keeping patients salubrious. But this is non the doctor's fault. Underuse occurs considering of fee-for-service. When construction workers get paid to build a business firm, that's what they do. They will not manicure the lawn, build a pool, or buy piece of furniture for that firm because that'southward not what they are paid to do. When the payment system just pays for the treatment of illness, that is what the physician is going to focus on.

That underuse hurts patients and drives upwardly costs. An estimated 45% of patients are not receiving recommended care.³⁴ This has serious repercussions:

Underuse kills patients. High blood force per unit area contributed to nearly a half a million deaths in 2018, yet 30 million people with high blood pressure are not receiving recommended care.³⁵ The underuse of generic loftier claret pressure medication costs $3 billion annually.³⁶
Underuse harms patients. Underusing controller medicines, such as an inhaler, costs the wellness arrangement $ii.5 billion and leads to increased ER use and a lower quality of life for patients.³⁷
Underuse of some types of preventive care is harmful and expensive. The underuse of preventive services costs the wellness care arrangement $55 billion.³⁸ For example, patients were screened for colorectal cancer just over 60% of the time.³⁹ Routine tests and appropriate follow-up could preclude 9,600 deaths a year.^twoscore For Black Americans, the lack of preventive care contributes to college rates of colorectal cancer and decease.⁴¹

Third, some patients get the wrong intendance. In these instances, sometimes chosen misused intendance, a patient does non fully benefit from a treatment, does non get the right treatment, or experiences errors in their treatment. In a single year, 25%-42% of Medicare patients will receive a low-value or useless exam or treatment.⁴² That ways millions of people are receiving drugs they do not demand, operations that are not benign, and scans and tests that do nothing to fix the problem.

That misuse harms patients and drives up costs . Misuse of care is at best a waste of money and at worst life-threatening to a patient. For instance:

Misuse kills patients. More than 250,000 people dice each twelvemonth in the U.S. from medical errors, making it the 3rd leading cause of death earlier the pandemic according to Johns Hopkins researchers.⁴³ Misuse costs the wellness system between $73 and $98 billion a year.⁴⁴
Misuse causes people to stay in the hospital and worry for no reason. Over half of CT scans for hospitalized patients have a finding unrelated to the reason for the scan, but but 7% of those findings are medically significant and can ofttimes be investigated outside of the infirmary.⁴⁵ Notwithstanding, almost doctors pursue those abnormalities despite additional trauma and costs to the patient. In a survey of patients that had incidental findings tested, 68% had psychological damage, sixteen% had doc harm, and 58% experienced a financial burden.⁴⁶
Misused intendance has downstream costs. The U.s.a. spent $450 million per year on a prostate test that is not recommended by the federal trunk responsible for determining which screenings are evidence-based preventive health measures. Nearly 75% of this nib came from downstream biopsies and related complications.⁴⁷

Trouble #2: Inflated Prices

Simply every bit fee-for-service distorts patient care, it also drives up prices. For constructive competition, health intendance purchasers—consumers, employers, and insurance plans—demand to compare the price and quality of providers to do good from choices almost their care and providers. But in the face of bills for more 10,000 kinds of services, health care purchasers have picayune chance of demanding better value. No one could shop for a automobile if you first had to purchase all the parts and get together it yourself.

Fee-for-service has iv separate just compounding problems that drive up health intendance prices:

Lack of transparency. A patient going into surgery has no thought how many 15-minute segments of an anesthesiologist'south time they volition demand, but that is how they volition be billed. The cost of health care is not transparent because purchasers cannot compare the price for a complete prepare of services billed nether fee-for-service.
No accountability for outcomes. Under fee-for-service, no single wellness professional is responsible for the results as measured past the outcome for the patients and the total toll of care. It is similar a professional person sports team without a coach and general manager. The clinicians may be the best in the world, but if no one oversees the squad, the intendance is non coordinated and the costs are out of control. That trouble also applies to all drugs and medical devices that can sometimes reduce costs by replacing expensive medical procedures performed by providers, just not if the providers come up with new means to bill for care. Although drugs found less than one-sixth of overall costs, their prices continually creep upwards in function because they are billed separately.⁴⁸ Farther, clinicians oftentimes utilise drugs without knowing the costs and commonly do not have any responsibility for restraining drug costs.
Provider pricing power. Hospitals and medical practices have been rapidly combining throughout the nation. Theoretically, that could assistance with the problem of no one overseeing a patient's care, but not if fee-for-service drives the underlying incentives in health care. Instead, the consolidation gives providers more leverage to accuse higher prices and increase the ways to bill creatively for services like the IV push button charges highlighted at the beginning of this written report. Unlike Medicare and Medicaid, the prices in the fee schedule are not regulated in the commercial market, where prices are determined through negotiation between doctors and insurers. That means if at that place is but one hospital or only one insurer in a region, they substantially go to dictate the price. For instance, health intendance costs in the state of New York are up to 2.7 times higher at some hospitals considering of their marketplace power.⁴⁹
Mounting authoritative costs. A system that requires a line item for each service and records to justify the charges increases the administrative burden on the dr. and on the wellness organisation. Repetitive disputes between providers and wellness plans over medically necessary care further add together to the administrative burdens.⁵⁰

The lack of transparency and accountability have compounded the problem of provider pricing power and rising administrative costs. Without a large change in the fee-for-service payment, whatever minimal benefits of competition that exist today in health care volition completely erode.

Determination

Experts on the right and left hold: our wellness intendance system is a mess because the incentives are wrong.⁵¹ The primal source of the problem is fee-for-service payments to physicians, hospitals, nursing homes, and other health intendance providers, which bill separately for each service or health care product they provide. This structure has created a serial of perverse incentives and utter lack of accountability. Equally a result, fee for service hurts patients and drives up costs.

Patients, families, and taxpayers deserve better. By understanding what fee-for-service is and the harm information technology inflicts, policymakers can so consider alternatives under development by public and private health plans. The nation must motility to a system that rewards value, not volume. A movement toward value-based payments could drive down costs, vastly improve the quality of care, and ensure a far more equitable system.

Endnotes

Bichell, Rae Ellen. "A Hospital Charged More Than $700 For Each Button of Medicine Through Her IV." National Public Radio, 28 Jun. 2021, www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/06/28/1007198777/a-infirmary-charged-more-than-700-for-each-push-of-medicine-through-her-4. Accessed thirty Jun. 2021.
Bichell, Rae Ellen. "A Hospital Charged More Than $700 For Each Push button of Medicine Through Her 4." National Public Radio, 28 Jun. 2021, world wide web.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/06/28/1007198777/a-infirmary-charged-more-than-700-for-each-push-of-medicine-through-her-iv. Accessed 30 Jun. 2021.
"CPT Codes, Then and Now." American Medical Association, 4 Aug. 2015, world wide web.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/cpt-codes-so-and-at present. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Rama, Apoorva. "Policy Research Perspectives: Payment and Delivery in 2018: Participation in Medical Homes and Accountable Intendance Organizations on the Ascent While Fee-for-Service Revenue Remains Stable." American Medical Association, Aug. 2019, www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/public/health-policy/prp-medical-home-aco-payment.pdf. Accessed vii Jul. 2021.
Bichell, Rae Ellen. "A Hospital Charged More Than $700 For Each Push of Medicine Through Her IV." National Public Radio, 28 Jun. 2021, www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/06/28/1007198777/a-hospital-charged-more than-than-700-for-each-push-of-medicine-through-her-iv. Accessed xxx Jun. 2021.
"ICD-10 Documentation Case." American University of Professional Coders (AAPC), world wide web.aapc.com/icd-ten/icd-10-documentation-example.aspx. Accessed eight Jul. 2021; "ICD-x-CM Structure." Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Teaching/Outreach/NPC/Downloads/Slides-from-the-011414-ICD10-Basics-Video.pdf. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
"Gratuitous 2020/2021 HCPCS Codes." HCPCS Data, www.hcpcsdata.com/Codes. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021; Maccariella%u2011Hafeyand, Pat. "CPT Coding: A Look at What's Coming in 2019." Health Information Associates, 19 Nov. 2018, world wide web.hiacode.com/education/a-look-at-whats-coming-in-2019-for-cpt/. Accessed eight Jul. 2021; "What is HCPCS?" American Academy of Professional Coders, www.aapc.com/resource/medical-coding/hcpcs.aspx. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
United State, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. "Fee Schedules - General Information," two Mar. 2021. www.cms.gov/index.php/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/FeeScheduleGenInfo/alphabetize. eight Jul. 2021.
Usa, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. "FY 2021 Wage Index Abode Folio: Tables 2, 3, 4A and 4B," www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Wage-Index-Files-Items/FY2021-Wage-Alphabetize-Home-Folio. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Muoio, Dave. "CMS sent out warnings to hospitals failing at price transparency. Some still aren't sure where they state." Fierce Healthcare, ten May 2021, www.fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals/cms-sent-out-its-first-moving ridge-warnings-to-hospitals-noncompliant-its-new-price-transparency. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021.
Henderson, Morgan and Morgane C. Mouslim. "Low Compliance from Big Hospitals on CMS's Hospital Price Transparency Dominion." Wellness Affairs, sixteen Mar. 2021. www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20210311.899634/full/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
"Bipartisan E&C Health Leaders Urge HHS to Enforce Hospital Transparency Rule." Press Release, House of Representatives Commission on Energy and Commerce, 13 April. 2021, https://energycommerce.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/bipartisan-ec-health-leaders-urge-hhs-to-enforce-infirmary-transparency-rule. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021; Muchmore, Shannon. "CMS pitches stiffening cost transparency fines, halting end of inpatient-only list." Healthcare Dive, 20 July 2021, www.healthcaredive.com/news/cms-pitches-stiffening-price-transparency-fines-halting-end-of-inpatient-o/603610/. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021.
"MS DRG Changes- 2019 Epitomize and 2020 Look Ahead." Besler, 2019, www.slideshare.net/beslerconsulting/ms-drg-changes-for-2020-173392086. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Cubanski, Juliette, et al. "A Primer on Medicare: Key Facts Virtually the Medicare Program and the People it Covers." Kaiser Family Foundation, 20 March 2015, www.kff.org/report-section/a-primer-on-medicare-how-does-medicare-pay-providers-in-traditional-medicare/. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Lyu, Heather et al. "Overtreatment in the The states." PLOS ONE, 24 Mar. 2017, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/manufactures/PMC5587107/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Pearl, Robert. "Healthcare's Dangerous Fee-For-Service Addiction." Forbes, 25 Sept. 2017, world wide web.forbes.com/sites/robertpearl/2017/09/25/fee-for-service-addiction/#692c3e87c8ad. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Latkovic, Tom. "The Trillion Dollar Prize: Using Outcomes-based Payment to Accost the United states of america Healthcare Financing Crunch." McKinsey and Company, Feb. 2013, https://healthcare.mckinsey.com/trillion-dollar-prize-using-outcomes-based-payment-address-the states-healthcare-financing-crisis/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
The states, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control. "Prescription Opioid Overdose Death Maps," 24 Mar. 2021, www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths/prescription/maps.html. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Brownlee, Shannon et al. "Testify for Overuse of Medical Services Around the World." Lancet, 8 Jul. 2017, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/manufactures/PMC5708862/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021; Elshaug, Adam. "Combating Overuse and Underuse in Wellness Care." The Commonwealth Fund, 23 Feb. 2017, www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/journal-article/2017/feb/combating-overuse-and-underuse-wellness-care. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Brownlee, Shannon et al. "Bear witness for Overuse of Medical Services Around the World." Lancet, viii Jul. 2017, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708862/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Burns, Megan, Mary Beth Dyer, and Michael Bailit. "Reducing Overuse and Misuse." Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Jan. 2014, www.shvs.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/RWJF_SHVS_ReducingOveruseMisuse.pdf. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Bogdanich, Walt and Jo Craven McGinty. "Medicare Claims Show Overuse for CT Scanning." New York Times, 17 Jun. 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/06/eighteen/health/18radiation.html. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Jackson, Whitney L. "What Can Radiologists Really Do About Unnecessary Imaging?" Diagnostic Imaging, 15 Jan. 2015, world wide web.diagnosticimaging.com/reimbursement/what-tin-radiologists-really-exercise-well-nigh-unnecessary-imaging. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Hoyt, Alia. "Which Medical Services Are Overused and Underused?" How Stuff Works, 19 Jan. 2017, health.howstuffworks.com/medicine/healthcare/which-medical-services-are-overuse-underused.htm. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
Van Houten, C.B. et al. "Observational Multi-Centre, Prospective Study to Characterize Novel Pathogen-and Host-related Factors in Hospitalized Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and/or Sepsis—the "TAILORED-Handling" Report." BMC Infectious Diseases, https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-018-3300-9. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Brownlee, Shannon et al. "Evidence for Overuse of Medical Services Around the Globe." Lancet, viii Jul. 2017, world wide web.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708862/. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
McGlynn, Elizabeth et al. "The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the The states." The New England Journal of Medicine, 26 June 2003, www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa022615#t=commodity. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Ayanian, John Z. "The Costs of Racial Disparities in Health Care." Harvard Business organisation Review, 1 October. 2015, https://hbr.org/2015/10/the-costs-of-racial-disparities-in-wellness-care. Accessed half-dozen Aug. 2021; DeMeester, Rachel et al. Solving Disparities Through Payment and Delivery System Reform: A Programme to Achieve Wellness Equity." Health Affairs, Jun. 2017, https://world wide web.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0979. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021.
Steinwald, Bruce et al. "Medicare Graduate Medical Teaching Funding is Non Addressing the Primary Care Shortage: We Need a Radically Different Approach." Brookings Institute, 3 Dec. 2018, www.brookings.edu/research/medicare-graduate-medical-educational activity-funding-is-not-addressing-the-primary-care-shortage-nosotros-need-a-radically-dissimilar-arroyo/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Kacik, Alex. "Primary-care Visits Dropped eighteen% from 2012 to 2016." Modernistic Healthcare, fifteen Nov. 2018, www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20181115/NEWS/181119962/primary-care-visits-dropped-18-from-2012-to-2016. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Kacik, Alex. "Md Fee Schedule Reform Needed to Bridge Primary-care Gap." Modern Healthcare, six Dec. 2018, www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20181206/NEWS/181209949/md-fee-schedule-reform-needed-to-bridge-primary-care-gap. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021; Kacik, Alex. "Principal-care Visits Dropped 18% from 2012 to 2016." Modern Healthcare, 15 November. 2018, www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20181115/NEWS/181119962/principal-care-visits-dropped-18-from-2012-to-2016. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021. McGlynn, Elizabeth et al. "The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States." The New England Journal of Medicine, 26 June 2003, www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa022615#t=commodity. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
Teare, Kendall. "One in Four Patients Say They've Skimped on Insulin Considering of Loftier Cost." Yale News, 3 Dec. 2018, https://news.yale.edu/2018/12/03/one-four-patients-say-theyve-skimped-insulin-because-high-cost. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Entis, Laura. "Why Does Medicine Price So Much? Here's How Drug Prices Are Set." Fourth dimension, 9 Apr. 2019, https://time.com/5564547/drug-prices-medicine/. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021.
McGlynn, Elizabeth et al. "The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the Us." The New England Periodical of Medicine, 26 June 2003, world wide web.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa022615#t=article. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
United States, Section of Health and Man Services, Centers for Disease Command. "Facts about Hypertension." 8 Sept. 2020, www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/facts.htm. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Delaune, Jules, and Wendy Everett, eds. "Waste and Inefficiency in the U.S. Health Care System." New England Healthcare Institute, February. 2008, world wide web.nehi-us.org/publications/13-waste-and-inefficiency-in-the-u-s-wellness-intendance-system-clinical-intendance/view. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Delaune, Jules, and Wendy Everett, eds. "Waste and Inefficiency in the U.Due south. Health Care Organisation." New England Healthcare Institute, Feb. 2008, www.nehi-u.s..org/publications/xiii-waste-and-inefficiency-in-the-u-south-health-care-system-clinical-intendance/view. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
Snow, Richard and Lauren McKown. "Value-based Payments and Principal Intendance." Principal Care Reports, 1 Sep. 2017, world wide web.reliasmedia.com/manufactures/141334-value-based-payments-and-primary-care. Delaune, Jules, and Wendy Everett, eds. "Waste material and Inefficiency in the U.S. Wellness Care System." New England Healthcare Found, Feb. 2008, www.nehi-us.org/publications/13-waste-and-inefficiency-in-the-u-south-wellness-care-arrangement-clinical-care/view. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
Hall, Ingrid et al. "Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the U.s.." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 26 Jul. 2018, www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2018/17_0465.htm. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
"Effective Care." Dartmouth Atlas and Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, 15 Jan. 2007, www.dartmouthatlas.org/atlases-and-reports/. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Chan, Andrew. "Racial Disparities and Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A Call to Activeness. Harvard Wellness Publishing: Harvard Medical School, 17 Mar. 2021, www.health.harvard.edu/blog/racial-disparities-and-early on-onset-colorectal-cancer-a-telephone call-to-action-202103172411. Accessed 6 Aug. 2021.
Gawande, Atul. "Overkill." The New Yorker, xi May 2015, world wide web.newyorker.com/mag/2015/05/eleven/overkill-atul-gawande. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
"Study Suggests Medical Errors At present Third Leading Cause of Death in the U.S." Johns Hopkins Medicine, 3 May 2016, www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Andel, Charles et al. "The Economics of Health Care Quality and Medical Errors." Journal of Wellness Intendance Finance, Fall 2012, world wide web.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155743. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
'Incidental Findings' from Scans Challenge Efforts to Reduce Health Care Costs." Johns Hopkins Medicine, 8 May 2017, www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/incidental_findings_from_scans_challenge_efforts_to_reduce_health_care_costs_. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
"What to do About Incidental Findings." Harvard Health Publishing, 1 Jan. 2020, world wide web.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/what-to-do-near-incidental-findings. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.
Ganguli, Ishani. "How One Medical Checkup Can Snowball into a 'Cascade' Of Tests, Causing More Impairment Than Good." The Washington Post, 5 Jan. 2020, www.washingtonpost.com/health/how-i-medical-checkup-can-snowball-into-a-cascade-of-tests-causing-more-harm-than-good/2020/01/03/0c8024fc-20eb-11ea-bed5-880264cc91a9_story.html. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
"A Look at Drug Spending in the U.S." Pew, 28 Aug. 2018. www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2018/02/a-look-at-drug-spending-in-the-the states. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Gorman Actuarial. "Why Are Hospital Prices Different? An Examination of New York Infirmary Reimbursement." New York Land Health Foundation, eighteen Dec. 2016, https://nyshealthfoundation.org/resource/an-test-of-new-york-infirmary-reimbursement/. Accessed viii Jul. 2021.
"Reinventing Utilization Management (UM) to Bring Value to the Point of Intendance: How an Automated Exception-Based Approach Can Make UM More Efficient and Constructive. Healthcare Information technology News, 18 Sep. 2018, www.healthcareitnews.com/news/reinventing-utilization-direction-um-bring-value-point-intendance. Accessed 8 Jul. 2021.
Rivlin, Alice M. and Sheila Burke. "Preserving The Bipartisan Delivery to Health Care Delivery System Reform." Health Affairs, eighteen May 2017. world wide web.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170518.060168/full/. Accessed eight Jul. 2021.